RT @BrianNosek: Massive status bias in peer review. 534 reviewers randomized to review the same paper revealing the low status, high status, or neither author. 65% reject low status, 23% reject high status. Amazing work by Juergen Huber and colleagues. #prc9 https://t.co/xEY7Sx0CYt
RT @BrianNosek: Massive status bias in peer review.
534 reviewers randomized to review the same paper revealing the low status, high status, or neither author. 65% reject low status, 23% reject high status.
Amazing work by Juergen Huber and colleagues. #prc9 https://t.co/xEY7Sx0CYt
— Stéphane Cottin (@cottinstef)
Sep 11, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/cottinstef
September 11, 2022 at 09:21AM
via IFTTT